So I have a Ph.D.

Well I don’t yet, but soon, hopefully soon, I will. But what will I do next? Therapy probably.

Today there has been an online chat forum on what to do with a Ph.D and yesterday the THE website ran an article about deluded young scientists thinking they’re going to become permanent academics. So what use is a Ph.D. and what should we expect to be able to do with it?

Ph.D.s can be done on all sorts of crazy things but for clarity, I’m talking about science doctorates here.

Only 30% of Ph.D. graduates get post doc positions, according to a report by the Royal Society. Now I know many students, including myself, who have been put off academic research but this figure is amazingly low and is set to get lower as funding dries up and jobs become scarcer.

Most students don’t realise what they’re getting themselves into when they sign up to a Ph.D. and most have dreams of becoming an eminent leading expert in their field. And on the face of it that’s all you need a Ph.D. for: it’s not a vocational qualification and very few jobs outside academia require one so why start if you’re not intent on getting to the top in research?

The reality is that in the long run 90% drop out of academia and move on. Now I don’t think that is because these people didn’t reach the top. Everybody wants career progression but I think it’s unreasonable to think you deserve to become a lecturer/Principal Investigator just because you’ve worked in research for many years – however horrible that experience has been. How many people in other professions get to the very top? Academia is a pyramid like almost all other workplaces.

The problem as I see it is that science is full of short contracts. Young scientists are expected to move around the world to experience different specialist areas of their field and master many different techniques in order to become a fully equipped research scientist. This creates instability which puts many people – especially women – off. It’s very hard to settle down, get a mortgage and start a family when your contract expires after three years.

Luckily Ph.D.s are valued in many areas outside academia: from the pharmaceutical industry through to teaching (the most popular destination for graduates) and even in government. Since the Roberts’ Report  universities have got a lot better at broadening the training that a Ph.D student receives so that the graduate leaves equipped with skills that are valued in the big bad world outside of academia. Amongst others I think it proves better than any other piece of paper that the individual is determined, a Ph.D. is long and not easy after all!

I’ve been looking at job advertisements and many state a post-graduate qualification as desirable and I know of lots of people who’s bosses have been very keen for them to get those two distinguished letters in front of their name asap. Because a Ph.D. impresses people, it’s relatively rare in the employment market and it sets you out from the crowd.

So what use is a Ph.D. and what should we expect to be able to do with it?

Everything and anything. But at the end of the day it’s just another qualification and it is you as a person who will get a job and become a success if you deserve it.

The Chemistry of Chocolate? Eggcellent.*

Part I

With Easter coming up, and so many people giving up their sweet tooth for Lent, it seems like chocolate is on everyone’s mind. So what better topic for my first blog post for Science Brainwaves than the science of chocolate…

The first record of chocolate dates back to around 1500 BC, when the Aztecs and Mayans began drinking a cold, bitter mixture of cocoa and water. They named this cacaoatl, which literally translates to “foamy water”. Delicious. Three thousand years later, chocolate reached the European mainland, and from then on, there was no stopping it. By 1831, John Cadbury was selling drinking chocolate, and in 1876, Nestle released the first bar of milk chocolate onto the market.

Despite the huge variety of chocolate on offer in the shops, the basic recipe is very simple – cocoa butter, sugar, cocoa solids and milk solids. The difference in taste comes mainly down to different amounts of each ingredient, although dark chocolate has no milk solids (which is why it tastes less “creamy”) and white chocolate has no cocoa solids, which explains the pale colour.

The way cocoa beans are processed are the key to how the end result will taste. After being picked, they’re fermented for about a week, dried for a fortnight and then transported to a factory. Fermenting the beans adds around 30 new chemicals to the mix, some useful and some not, so at the factory, the beans undergo a process known as the Maillard reaction. It has at least 9 steps, and converts the amino acids in the cocoa beans (which don’t taste of anything) to aldehydes (which generally taste great).  Depending on how hot the reaction is, how acidic you make it and how long you run it for, you can get over 1000 different tastes from the Maillard reaction, including coffee, caramel and roasting meat.

Next, cocoa solids (made from grinding the beans) are conched. This means warming them up, grinding them with sugar and blowing air over the top. The heat removes any volatile (easily evaporated) chemicals from the beans, and the air whisks them away. The main thing removed from the beans is acetic acid, which is more commonly known as household vinegar.

Conching the cocoa solids decides what quality the chocolate is. The smaller they get, the better the chocolate – anything greater than 0.03mm (0.003cm, or three hundred thousandths of a metre) wide and the chocolate will feel gritty in your mouth. European chocolatiers, like the Belgians and Swiss, prefer very, very fine particles, which makes it melt more slowly in your mouth, and explains why European chocolate is more expensive.

A useful tip is to never store chocolate anywhere too warm or too cold. If you leave it in a warm room, you get a “fat bloom” – the white powder you sometimes find when you keep an Easter egg for too long, or forget about the Dairy Milk in your handbag. The increased heat means the fat rises to the top where you can see it. You can get rid of the bloom by gently warming it, then letting it cool down slowly, but it’s tricky to get it right without ending up with a puddle of chocolate. If you keep your chocolate in the fridge, you’ll get a “sugar bloom”. Any water vapour inside the fridge or the packet will collect on the surface of the chocolate as it cools down, dissolving any sugar it can reach. This eventually crystallizes on the top, giving you a gritty layer of sugar on your chocolate. There’s no way to undo this, so store your KitKat at room temperature for the best taste and texture.

* Well done if you made it past the pun! The alternative was “The Easter Bun(ny)sen.” In part II, I’ll be looking at why chocolate makes you feel good, and how it can help you stay awake. Title suggestions gratefully received!